Player Results

STATE DAYTIME PAIRS SESSION 2 (23-FEB-22)

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

Back to this session's results

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	5: Hugh Grosvenor / Ian Bailey	3 N	QC	11	-200	4	33%
Board 2	5: Hugh Grosvenor / Ian Bailey	2 W	JS	6	-100	10	83%
Board 3	5: Hugh Grosvenor / Ian Bailey	4 S	KS	9	50	10	83%
Board 4	5: Hugh Grosvenor / Ian Bailey	4 W	AH	11	650	7	58%
Board 5	1: Adrienne Norton / Susan West	3 W	QH	10	130	3	25%
Board 6	1: Adrienne Norton / Susan West	2 E	KD	7	-100	4	33%
Board 7	1: Adrienne Norton / Susan West	3 N	AS	8	100	8	67%
Board 8	1: Adrienne Norton / Susan West	3 E	5D	7	-100	0	0%
Board 9	6: Elizabeth Parsons / Margaret Lawrence	3 N	QS	10	130	5	42%
Board 10	6: Elizabeth Parsons / Margaret Lawrence	3NT S	5H	10	630	10	83%
Board 11	6: Elizabeth Parsons / Margaret Lawrence	2 E	3D	8	-110	1	8%
Board 12	6: Elizabeth Parsons / Margaret Lawrence	3 W	TD	7	100	11	92%
Board 13	2: Leonie Atkins / Mary George	3NT E	9H	12	690	3	25%
Board 14	2: Leonie Atkins / Mary George	3NT N	3S	9	-400	9	75%
Board 15	2: Leonie Atkins / Mary George	5 E	KS	11	400	7	58%
Board 16	2: Leonie Atkins / Mary George	2 W	JD	8	110	12	100%
Board 17	7: Margaret Cumming / Irene Chau	3NT S	2S	6	-150	0	0%
Board 18	7: Margaret Cumming / Irene Chau	3NT N	9H	8	-100	5	42%
Board 19	7: Margaret Cumming / Irene Chau	1NT E	4H	8	-120	4	33%
Board 20	7: Margaret Cumming / Irene Chau	3NT N	JS	11	660	12	100%
Board 21	3: Richard Cooke / Bob Patterson	3NT N	2C	9	-600	7	58%
Board 22	3: Richard Cooke / Bob Patterson	2 N	TS	7	50	2	17%
Board 23	3: Richard Cooke / Bob Patterson	4 N	5C	10	-620	4	33%
Board 24	3: Richard Cooke / Bob Patterson	1 W	AD	4	-150	2	17%
Board 29	8: Pam Murphy / Julie Rhodes	2 W	AC	6	-200	1	8%
Board 30	8: Pam Murphy / Julie Rhodes	4 S	4D	12	-480	4	33%
Board 31	8: Pam Murphy / Julie Rhodes	5 E	KC	12	480	3	25%
Board 32	8: Pam Murphy / Julie Rhodes	2 W	6C	7	-100	11	92%