TASMANIAN ONLINE RED POINT PAIRS (27-APR-22)

Pair 5 - Fiona HICKEY / Alaine MACMORRAN
Place: 2, Percentage: 54%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	6: Hugh GROSVENOR / John GROSVENOR	3 N	SA	9	140	3	75%
Board 2	6: Hugh GROSVENOR / John GROSVENOR	3 N	H5	7	-200	1	25%
Board 3	6: Hugh GROSVENOR / John GROSVENOR	3 W	CK	7	200	1	25%
Board 4	6: Hugh GROSVENOR / John GROSVENOR	3 N	C6	11	150	2	50%
Board 5	6: Hugh GROSVENOR / John GROSVENOR	4 E	HK	9	50	3	75%
Board 6	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	5 W	DK	10	100	4	100%
Board 7	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	2 N	DA	10	170	3	75%
Board 8	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	3NT W	HT	9	-400	3	75%
Board 9	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	6 N	S7	12	980	4	100%
Board 10	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	3NT E	S5	11	-660	3	75%
Board 11	2: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	2 S	H5	7	-50	2	50%
Board 12	2: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	6NT W	SQ	12	-990	0	0%
Board 13	2: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	3NT N	D4	9	600	1	25%
Board 14	2: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	3NT W	HQ	9	-400	2	50%
Board 15	2: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	4 N	DT	10	620	3	75%
Board 16	4: Brian GILES / Rosemary GILES	1NT S	CK	6	50	0	0%
Board 17	4: Brian GILES / Rosemary GILES	3 N	HJ	8	50	2	50%
Board 18	4: Brian GILES / Rosemary GILES	4 E	DA	9	-50	0	0%
Board 19	4: Brian GILES / Rosemary GILES	4 S	D5	7	150	4	100%
Board 20	4: Brian GILES / Rosemary GILES	3NT E	H3	12	690	4	100%
Board 21	3: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	3 N	D8	11	-150	3	75%
Board 22	3: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	5 W	S3	11	600	0	0%
Board 23	3: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	4 W	SA	9	-100	0	0%
Board 24	3: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	2 W	CA	8	110	4	100%
Board 25	3: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	4 N	C7	10	-420	2	50%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results