TUESDAY DAYTIME (10-JUN-25)

Pair 9 EW - Henry Nogajski / Ruth Nogajski
Place: 1, Percentage: 59.82%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	5: David Crisp / Pam Barter	4 W	3C	10	420	4	29%
Board 2	5: David Crisp / Pam Barter	3NT W	JC	12	490	9	64%
Board 3	5: David Crisp / Pam Barter	2 S	6D	8	-110	1	7%
Board 4	1: Maureen Richardson / Mary Bell	3NT N	5D	9	-600	8	57%
Board 5	1: Maureen Richardson / Mary Bell	2NT E	7D	8	120	8	57%
Board 6	1: Maureen Richardson / Mary Bell	5 N	8D	8	150	14	100%
Board 7	6: Anne Travers / Paul Fredheim	3NT E	6D	10	630	14	100%
Board 8	6: Anne Travers / Paul Fredheim	2 E	4C	8	110	7	50%
Board 9	6: Anne Travers / Paul Fredheim	5 E	2H	11	600	2	14%
Board 10	2: Julie Rhodes / Rafiul Rafi	2 E	4H	9	110	1	7%
Board 11	2: Julie Rhodes / Rafiul Rafi	3NT W	4S	8	-50	5	36%
Board 12	2: Julie Rhodes / Rafiul Rafi	3NT N	4S	8	100	10	71%
Board 13	7: Anne O'Rourke / Wynne Webber	2 E	KD	9	140	12	86%
Board 14	7: Anne O'Rourke / Wynne Webber	1NT S	2D	7	-90	4	29%
Board 15	7: Anne O'Rourke / Wynne Webber	2 E	2S	9	140	9	64%
Board 16	3: Mary Dwyer / Judith Abbott	4 S	KS	9	50	13	93%
Board 17	3: Mary Dwyer / Judith Abbott	2 W	QC	10	170	14	100%
Board 18	3: Mary Dwyer / Judith Abbott	4 S	AS	7	300	14	100%
Board 22	4: Richard Holland / Alison Holland	4 E	8D	12	680	12	86%
Board 23	4: Richard Holland / Alison Holland	2NT N	6H	9	-150	8	57%
Board 24	4: Richard Holland / Alison Holland	4 W	2D	11	450	13	93%
Board 25	9: Angie McDermott / Helen Sparrow	2 W	AS	8	90	5	36%
Board 26	9: Angie McDermott / Helen Sparrow	4 S	AD	11	-650	7	50%
Board 27	9: Angie McDermott / Helen Sparrow	5X N	9C	10	100	7	50%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results